Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.

500 F.2d 1221, 182 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 577
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1974
DocketNo. 1228, Docket 74-1726
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 500 F.2d 1221 (Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 500 F.2d 1221, 182 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 577 (2d Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants assert error in the grant of a preliminary injunction.

This is essentially a dispute between the publishers of competing textbooks in the child development field. The defendants-appellees, seeking redress as copyright holders, convinced Judge Owen upon a persuasive factual record that they would probably succeed on the merits, that the appellants had plagiarized their textbook, and that there was need for immediate relief. There was a sufficient basis for the findings and conclusions of the District Court and since they are not clearly erroneous, Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a), we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
500 F.2d 1221, 182 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meredith-corp-v-harper-row-publishers-inc-ca2-1974.