Mercy v. State

67 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2011 WL 3477046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 10, 2011
Docket4D10-347
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 So. 3d 428 (Mercy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercy v. State, 67 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2011 WL 3477046 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to seek available relief in the trial court. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999) (authorizing a belated post-conviction motion where post-conviction counsel’s actions deprive the defendant of the ability to seek rule 3.850 relief).

POLEN, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ESTAPE v. Scherer
67 So. 3d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2011 WL 3477046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercy-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.