Mercy v. State

67 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2011 WL 3477046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2011·No. 4D10-347·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to seek available relief in the trial court. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999) (authorizing a belated post-conviction motion where post-conviction counsel’s actions deprive the defendant of the ability to seek rule 3.850 relief).

POLEN, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercy v. State, 67 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550, 2011 WL 3477046 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

67 So. 3d 428 (Mercy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ESTAPE v. Scherer
67 So. 3d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)