Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores

Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores

870 So. 2d 127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19198, 2003 WL 22956421
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 2003
Docket3D03-453
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 870 So. 2d 127 (Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 870 So. 2d 127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19198, 2003 WL 22956421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

870 So.2d 127 (2003)

MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Clara FLORES, Appellee.

No. 3D03-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 17, 2003.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.

*128 Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So.2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores
905 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Burgess Transportation, Inc. v. Arostegui
882 So. 2d 411 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 127, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19198, 2003 WL 22956421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercury-cas-co-v-flores-fladistctapp-2003.