Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean

205 A.D.2d 596, 614 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 13, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 596 (Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean, 205 A.D.2d 596, 614 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose on a mortgage on real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 16, 1992, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that, as a matter of law, the subject loan qualifies as a "federally related mortgage loan”, such that State usury laws do not apply (see, 12 USC §§ 1735f-7a, 1735f-5 [b]; Banking Law § 14-a [7]). Because the appellants do not dispute allegations that they defaulted on the loan, the plaintiff is entitled to foreclose on the mortgage.

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wasserman v. Harriman
234 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 596, 614 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercury-capital-corp-v-mcgeean-nyappdiv-1994.