Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean

205 A.D.2d 596, 614 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to foreclose on a mortgage on real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 16, 1992, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that, as a matter of law, the subject loan qualifies as a "federally related mortgage loan”, such that State usury laws do not apply (see, 12 USC §§ 1735f-7a, 1735f-5 [b]; Banking Law § 14-a [7]). Because the appellants do not dispute allegations that they defaulted on the loan, the plaintiff is entitled to foreclose on the mortgage.

We have considered the appellants’ remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean, 205 A.D.2d 596, 614 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 596 (Mercury Capital Corp. v. McGeean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wasserman v. Harriman
234 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)