Merck v. United States

99 F. 432, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3458
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1899
DocketNo. 2,533
StatusPublished

This text of 99 F. 432 (Merck v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merck v. United States, 99 F. 432, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3458 (circtsdny 1899).

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). The articles in question are bottles holding, respectively, more and not more than one pint, and holding various kinds of merchandise, some free, some subject to a specific duty, and some subject to an ad valorem duty. The importer admits that, as to the bottles holding not more than one pint, the duty assessed under paragraph 88 of the act of 1894 is [433]*433correct. All the questions herein as to bottles holding not more than one pint have been disposed of by the courts. That the bottles holding free goods and those subject to a specific duty are free is decided in U. S. v. Leggett, 13 C. C. A. 448, 66 Fed. 300, and the cases below cited; that the bottles holding merchandise subject to au ad valorem duty are not themselves subject to duty is decided in U. S. v. Dickson, 19 C. C. A. 428, 73 Fed. 195, and U. S. v. Ross, 33 C. C. A. 361, 91 Fed. 108. The decision of the hoard of general appraisers is affirmed as to the bottles holding more than one pint, and reversed as to those holding not more than one pint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Leggett
66 F. 300 (Second Circuit, 1895)
United States v. Dickson
73 F. 195 (Second Circuit, 1896)
United States v. Ross
91 F. 108 (Second Circuit, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F. 432, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merck-v-united-states-circtsdny-1899.