Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie

222 So. 2d 658, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5122
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 5, 1969
DocketNo. 3316
StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 2d 658 (Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie, 222 So. 2d 658, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5122 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

YARRUT, Judge.

This suit on a promissory note was instituted by the payee-holder against the maker and endorsers. Defendants have prosecuted this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

Appellants did not make an appearance when the case was regularly called for argument, nor have they filed a brief herein. The Appellee alone appeared, submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since Appellants have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the Trial Court, and as there is no error patent on the face of the record, we must affirm that judgment under the presumption it is correct. See Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alice v. Woods
124 So. 2d 770 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 So. 2d 658, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-trust-savings-bank-v-guthrie-lactapp-1969.