Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie

222 So. 2d 658, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5122

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 5, 1969·No. No. 3316·Published

Opinion

YARRUT, Judge.

This suit on a promissory note was instituted by the payee-holder against the maker and endorsers. Defendants have prosecuted this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

Appellants did not make an appearance when the case was regularly called for argument, nor have they filed a brief herein. The Appellee alone appeared, submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since Appellants have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the Trial Court, and as there is no error patent on the face of the record, we must affirm that judgment under the presumption it is correct. See Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YARRUT, Judge.

This suit on a promissory note was instituted by the payee-holder against the maker and endorsers. Defendants have prosecuted this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

Appellants did not make an appearance when the case was regularly called for argument, nor have they filed a brief herein. The Appellee alone appeared, submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since Appellants have not pointed out any error in the judgment of the Trial Court, and as there is no error patent on the face of the record, we must affirm that judgment under the presumption it is correct. See Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie, 222 So. 2d 658, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5122 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

222 So. 2d 658 (Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Guthrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related