Merchants' & Planters' Bank v. Caston

52 So. 633, 97 Miss. 309
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 So. 633 (Merchants' & Planters' Bank v. Caston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merchants' & Planters' Bank v. Caston, 52 So. 633, 97 Miss. 309 (Mich. 1910).

Opinion

Andüjírs'on, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question in this case is whether this contract is usurious: Note for $1,000 loan, dated January 22, 1907, due July 22, 1907 (six months after date), with interest added in the face of the note at 10 per cent, per annum from date until due, making the note for $1,050, and providing for interest on ' this amount at 10 per cent, per annum from maturity until paid. Under the authority of Palm v. Fancher, 93 Miss. 785, 48 South. 818, we hold that it is not. Carter v. Holloway, 28 South. 941, was necessarily overruled by Palm v. Fancher, supra.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. Dattel
83 F.2d 504 (Fifth Circuit, 1936)
Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. Davis
163 So. 506 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Rogers v. Rivers
100 So. 385 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 633, 97 Miss. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-planters-bank-v-caston-miss-1910.