Merchants' National Bank v. Northrup

23 N.J. Eq. 582
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1872·Published

Opinion

Bedle, J.

The question on this appeal is purely of fact- — -Whether the deed sought to be set aside was in fraud of creditors ? [583]*583The transaction is very suspicions, but the evidence fails to sufficiently satisfy us that it was fraudulent. The decree of ■¡he Chancellor must therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Eor affirmance — Beasley, C. J., Bedle, Clement, Dalkimele, Deetje, Dodd, Ogden, Scudded, Van Syckel, WOODIIULL. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merchants' National Bank v. Northrup, 23 N.J. Eq. 582 (N.J. 1872).

23 N.J. Eq. 582 (Merchants' National Bank v. Northrup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.