Merchants National Bank of Seattle v. Ault

44 P. 129, 14 Wash. 701, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 441
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 29, 1896·No. No. 2030·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the argument it was suggested by counsel for respondents that no notice of appeal from the judgment rendered below had been given, and none appears in the transcript on file in this court. It follows that we are without jurisdiction to entertain the cause upon the merits.

We may add, however, that were we to retain the case, respondents’ motion to strike the statement of facts would have to be granted for the reasons given in American Asphalt Co. v. Gribble, 8 Wash. 256 (35 Pac. 1098).

The appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merchants National Bank of Seattle v. Ault, 44 P. 129, 14 Wash. 701, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 441 (Wash. 1896).

44 P. 129 (Merchants National Bank of Seattle v. Ault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Asphalt Co. v. Gribble
35 P. 1098 (Washington Supreme Court, 1894)
Zelinsky v. Price
36 P. 28 (Washington Supreme Court, 1894)