Merchants National Bank of Seattle v. Ault
This text of 44 P. 129 (Merchants National Bank of Seattle v. Ault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the argument it was suggested by counsel for respondents that no notice of appeal from the judgment rendered below had been given, and none appears in the transcript on file in this court. It follows that we are without jurisdiction to entertain the cause upon the merits.
We may add, however, that were we to retain the case, respondents’ motion to strike the statement of facts would have to be granted for the reasons given in American Asphalt Co. v. Gribble, 8 Wash. 256 (35 Pac. 1098).
The appeal must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 P. 129, 14 Wash. 701, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-national-bank-of-seattle-v-ault-wash-1896.