Merchants Nat. Bank v. Mosser
29 A. 1, 161 Pa. 469, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 718
Opinion
For reasons given by the learned judge who specially presided at the hearing, we think there is no error in the decree. All that is necessary to be said in relation to the questions involved will be found in his opinion.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merchants Nat. Bank v. Mosser, 29 A. 1, 161 Pa. 469, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 718 (Pa. 1894).
29 A. 1 (Merchants Nat. Bank v. Mosser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. Kulongoski
210 P.3d 884 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2009)
United States v. Thompson
Fifth Circuit, 1997
United States v. Billy Mac Thompson
130 F.3d 676 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Farmers National Bank v. Kern
168 A.2d 620 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
State ex rel. Stewart v. Police Jury
34 La. 673 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)
Rougelot v. Quick
34 La. 123 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)