Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Calandra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Calandra

51 A.D.2d 738, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11246

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 1976·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, respondent Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 15, 1975 and made after a hearing, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the notice by the injured party of the automobile accident to appellant was reasonably prompt under the circumstances of this case. Special Term properly held appellant’s disclaimer to be invalid and ineffective. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, respondent Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 15, 1975 and made after a hearing, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the notice by the injured party of the automobile accident to appellant was reasonably prompt under the circumstances of this case. Special Term properly held appellant’s disclaimer to be invalid and ineffective. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Calandra, 51 A.D.2d 738, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

51 A.D.2d 738 (Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Calandra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.