Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Idore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Idore

10 A.D.3d 612, 781 N.Y.S.2d 674, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10607

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 A.D.3d 612 (Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Idore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Idore, 10 A.D.3d 612, 781 N.Y.S.2d 674, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), entered May 6, 2003, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“It is well established that the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court’s conclusions could not be reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially in cases resting in large part on the credibility of witnesses” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v McMahon, 251 AD2d 571, 572 [1998]; see Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto,. Ins. Co. v Mucerino, 275 AD2d 464 [2000]). Here, the record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellants failed to sustain their burden at the framed issue hearing to demonstrate that there was physical contact between their vehicle and the vehicle that allegedly fled the scene, a condition precedent to arbitration (see Insurance Law § 5217; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Killakey, 78 NY2d 325, 328 [1991]; Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. v Gramazio, 242 AD2d 530 [1997]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), entered May 6, 2003, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and permanently stayed the arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“It is well established that the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court’s conclusions could not be reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially in cases resting in large part on the credibility of witnesses” (Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v McMahon, 251 AD2d 571, 572 [1998]; see Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto,. Ins. Co. v Mucerino, 275 AD2d 464 [2000]). Here, the record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellants failed to sustain their burden at the framed issue hearing to demonstrate that there was physical contact between their vehicle and the vehicle that allegedly fled the scene, a condition precedent to arbitration (see Insurance Law § 5217; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Killakey, 78 NY2d 325, 328 [1991]; Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. v Gramazio, 242 AD2d 530 [1997]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.3d 612, 781 N.Y.S.2d 674, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-mutual-insurance-group-v-idore-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack