Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. v. Ocean S. S. Co.

Second Circuit

Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. v. Ocean S. S. Co.

85 F.2d 102, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043, 1936 A.M.C. 1301

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 27, 1936

DocketNo. 460

StatusPublished

This text of 85 F.2d 102 (Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. v. Ocean S. S. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merchants & Miners Transp. Co. v. Ocean S. S. Co., 85 F.2d 102, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043, 1936 A.M.C. 1301 (2d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came before us on a previous appeal from an interlocutory decree in which certain exceptions to the claimant’s answer were sustained. That decree was reversed. The Grecian (C.C.A.) 78 F.(2d) 657. Trial has now been had on the merits, and this appeal is by the libelant from a final decree in accordance with the legal principles held applicable when the case was here before. The facts which now appear are not materially different from those which were before taken as established by the pleadings for the purposes of that appeal, and the present purpose of the appellant is frankly an effort to have now corrected what it believes were the errors in our previous decision. It is in effect but a rehearing of the issues 'before considered and decided. A majority of the court is of the opinion that our former decision was correctly .applied in the court below and that it should be given effect until and unless it is reviewed and reversed by higher authority.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came before us on a previous appeal from an interlocutory decree in which certain exceptions to the claimant’s answer were sustained. That decree was reversed. The Grecian (C.C.A.) 78 F.(2d) 657. Trial has now been had on the merits, and this appeal is by the libelant from a final decree in accordance with the legal principles held applicable when the case was here before. The facts which now appear are not materially different from those which were before taken as established by the pleadings for the purposes of that appeal, and the present purpose of the appellant is frankly an effort to have now corrected what it believes were the errors in our previous decision. It is in effect but a rehearing of the issues 'before considered and decided. A majority of the court is of the opinion that our former decision was correctly .applied in the court below and that it should be given effect until and unless it is reviewed and reversed by higher authority.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 F.2d 102, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043, 1936 A.M.C. 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-miners-transp-co-v-ocean-s-s-co-ca2-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack