Merchants Importing, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Merchants Importing, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 515

United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1957·No. No. 60797; protests 277185-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[516]*516Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letters “B” and “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[516]*516Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letters “B” and “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Merchants Importing, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 515 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 515 (Merchants Importing, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.