Merchants Etc. Bank v. Marley

Arizona Supreme Court

Merchants Etc. Bank v. Marley

264 P. 472, 33 Ariz. 335, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 204

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 1928

DocketCivil No. 2674.

StatusPublished

This text of 264 P. 472 (Merchants Etc. Bank v. Marley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merchants Etc. Bank v. Marley, 264 P. 472, 33 Ariz. 335, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 204 (Ark. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage on certain property in Navajo county. The legal propositions involved are to a great extent the same as those in the case ofMerchants and Stock Growers Bank v. Cora A. Marley, ante, p. 294, 264 P. 471, Cause No. 2590, and it is necessary that this case be reversed for the same error as that in the case just referred to. The judgment of the superior court of Navajo county is reversed, and the cause remanded for new trial. *Page 336

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage on certain property in Navajo county. The legal propositions involved are to a great extent the same as those in the case ofMerchants and Stock Growers Bank v. Cora A. Marley, ante, p. 294, 264 P. 471, Cause No. 2590, and it is necessary that this case be reversed for the same error as that in the case just referred to. The judgment of the superior court of Navajo county is reversed, and the cause remanded for new trial. *Page 336

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 P. 472, 33 Ariz. 335, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-etc-bank-v-marley-ariz-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack