Merchant v. State

474 So. 2d 1274, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2091, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15718
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 1985
DocketNo. BE-210
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 So. 2d 1274 (Merchant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merchant v. State, 474 So. 2d 1274, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2091, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an adjudication of guilty for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The public defender has submitted an Anders brief. Merchant has not submitted a pro se brief, although given the opportunity. We affirm.

After review of the record, the transcript of the suppression hearing and the transcript of a motion for new trial, we find no cause to overturn the trial judge. The credibility of witnesses on a motion to suppress is solely a matter of judicial discretion and there is sufficient evidence to support the court’s finding of consent to search.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
474 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 So. 2d 1274, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2091, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchant-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.