MERCER v. YOUGHN

M.D. Georgia

MERCER v. YOUGHN

DecidedMay 19, 2025

Docket7:24-cv-00095

StatusUnknown

This text of MERCER v. YOUGHN (MERCER v. YOUGHN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MERCER v. YOUGHN, (M.D. Ga. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IFNO TRH TEH UEN MIITDEDDL SET DATISETSR DICISTT ORFIC GTE COORUGRIAT VALDOSTA DIVISION

FLORINE R. MERCER, surviving parent of deceased : HENRY WILSON MERCER, and, : ROSE MARY CHRISTIE, as Administrator of the : Estate of deceased HENRY WILSON MERCER, : : CASE NO: Plaintiffs, : 7:24-cv-95–WLS v. : : SHERIFF CODY YOUGHN, : STANLEY WHITLEY, : ANTHONY REAVES, : IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, and : JOHN DOES 1-3, :

: Defendants. : _________________________________________ ORDER On May 15, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision with respect to a court’s evaluation of the reasonableness of an officer’s use of deadly force. See Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239, 2025 WL 1401083, --- U.S. --- (May 15, 2025). Barnes has significant implications on the Court’s analysis of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). The Court thus finds it appropriate to afford each Party the opportunity to submit its position on the impact of Barnes on the arguments for dismissal asserted. Any supplemental brief shall address the impact of Barnes on: (1) if a Fourth Amendment violation occurred, and (2) if Defendants violated clearly established law. Consequently, the Parties are ORDERED to each submit a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Barnes as noted no later than Friday, June 6, 2025. The briefs shall be no longer than five pages. No further briefing is authorized. SO ORDERED, this 19th day of May 2025.

/s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IFNO TRH TEH UEN MIITDEDDL SET DATISETSR DICISTT ORFIC GTE COORUGRIAT VALDOSTA DIVISION

FLORINE R. MERCER, surviving parent of deceased : HENRY WILSON MERCER, and, : ROSE MARY CHRISTIE, as Administrator of the : Estate of deceased HENRY WILSON MERCER, : : CASE NO: Plaintiffs, : 7:24-cv-95–WLS v. : : SHERIFF CODY YOUGHN, : STANLEY WHITLEY, : ANTHONY REAVES, : IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, and : JOHN DOES 1-3, :

: Defendants. : _________________________________________ ORDER On May 15, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision with respect to a court’s evaluation of the reasonableness of an officer’s use of deadly force. See Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239, 2025 WL 1401083, --- U.S. --- (May 15, 2025). Barnes has significant implications on the Court’s analysis of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). The Court thus finds it appropriate to afford each Party the opportunity to submit its position on the impact of Barnes on the arguments for dismissal asserted. Any supplemental brief shall address the impact of Barnes on: (1) if a Fourth Amendment violation occurred, and (2) if Defendants violated clearly established law. Consequently, the Parties are ORDERED to each submit a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Barnes as noted no later than Friday, June 6, 2025. The briefs shall be no longer than five pages. No further briefing is authorized. SO ORDERED, this 19th day of May 2025.

/s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

MERCER v. YOUGHN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-youghn-gamd-2025.