Mercer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mercer v. State

486 So. 2d 687, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7364

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 1986

DocketNo. 84-2547

StatusPublished

This text of 486 So. 2d 687 (Mercer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mercer v. State, 486 So. 2d 687, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7364 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions are affirmed because the suggested trial errors are harmless beyond any reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio (Fla.1985) (Case No. 65,490, opinion filed August 29, 1985). We reverse the sentence in part and direct that the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences imposed on Counts II and III of the indictment be made to run concurrently. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983).

Conviction affirmed; sentence reversed in part with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s convictions are affirmed because the suggested trial errors are harmless beyond any reasonable doubt. See State v. DiGuilio (Fla.1985) (Case No. 65,490, opinion filed August 29, 1985). We reverse the sentence in part and direct that the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences imposed on Counts II and III of the indictment be made to run concurrently. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983).

Conviction affirmed; sentence reversed in part with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

486 So. 2d 687, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack