Mercer v. Lovering

19 P.2d 936, 172 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 797
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mercer v. Lovering. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 Wash. 140
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1933·No. No. 23856. En Banc.·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to Fawcett v. Manny, ante p. 212. The two cases were heard and decided at the same time, 170 Wash. 148, 15 P. (2d) 933, and 170 Wash. 140, 15 P. (2d) 933, and a rehearing was granted in each ease thereafter. After the rehearing was granted, this case was compromised and settled, and a stipulation filed in this court for the dismissal of the appeal without costs.

In the light of this disposition of the case by the parties, and in view of the results finally reached in the case of Fawcett v. Manny, ante p. 212, the opinion of this court heretofore filed in this case, 170 Wash. 140, 15 P. (2d) 930, will be held for naught and disregarded for any and all purposes.

The last and final opinion in the case of Fawcett v. Manny, supra, will he considered as the expression of this court upon the questions of law which were involved in this ease.

In accordance with the stipulation, the appeal is dismissed without costs to either party, and the former opinion is set aside and vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercer v. Lovering, 19 P.2d 936, 172 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 797 (Wash. 1933).

19 P.2d 936 (Mercer v. Lovering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mercer v. Lovering
15 P.2d 930 (Washington Supreme Court, 1932)
Fawcett v. Manny
15 P.2d 933 (Washington Supreme Court, 1932)