Mercer v. Hauts

7 Ky. 399, 4 Bibb 399, 1816 Ky. LEXIS 81
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 10, 1816
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ky. 399 (Mercer v. Hauts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercer v. Hauts, 7 Ky. 399, 4 Bibb 399, 1816 Ky. LEXIS 81 (Ky. Ct. App. 1816).

Opinion

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

Be* Cause the surveyor’s report, made in this cause, failed to represent the survey under which the plaintiff claimed the land in contest, the court below refused to admit the introduction of a witness offered by him to prove his boundary; and the only question for the determination of this court, is, should the evidence have been admitted ?

This question has by the repeated decisions of this court been in effect determined in the affirmative ; and as we suppose those decisions accord with the well known and established rules of evidence, the judgment, of the court below must be reversed with costs, the cause remanded, and a new trial had consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ky. 399, 4 Bibb 399, 1816 Ky. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-hauts-kyctapp-1816.