Mercer v. Fairfax County Child Protective Services
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Gregory Shawn Mercer appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,- we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mercer v. Fairfax Cnty. Child Protective Servs., No. 1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 25 & Dec. 17, 2015; Feb. 11, 2016). The motions- to compel, for a subpoena, to clarify, and to direct a state judge to verify a record’s existence are denied. We grant the motions to exceed the length limitations for the brief and to file amended and supplemental informal reply briefs and amendments. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
673 F. App'x 358 (Mercer v. Fairfax County Child Protective Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.