Mercer v. D.E.F., Inc.

48 B.R. 562, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6301
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedApril 16, 1985
Docket19-30334
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 48 B.R. 562 (Mercer v. D.E.F., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercer v. D.E.F., Inc., 48 B.R. 562, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6301 (Minn. 1985).

Opinion

ORDER

DENNIS D. O’BRIEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on March 8, 1985, for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Color Tyme, Inc., should be held in contempt of Court for violation of the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) in connection with its repossession of certain stereo equipment. A preliminary hearing for an order to show cause why Color Tyme, Inc., should not be held in contempt of Court was heard on January 31,1985, and a temporary restraining order against Color Tyme, Inc., was issued as a result of that hearing. By Order dated February 1, 1985, this Court enjoined Color Tyme from taking any action against the Debtor and directing Color Tyme to return the repossessed property. Samuel Wertheimer appeared representing the Debtor. Robert Steigauf appeared representing Color Tyme. Based on the file, records, evidence adduced at the hearing, briefs and arguments of counsel, the Court makes this Order pursuant to the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

I.

The Debtor, Kathleen Mercer, is a single parent. She has three children, Robert age 15, Niki age 3, and one 18-year-old child not living at home. She resides at 812 Stewart, St. Paul, Minnesota. The home is rented from her aunt, Marlene McBride. Ms. Mercer has been employed as a cashier for Minnesota Mutual of St. Paul for the past two years. Her gross income for 1984 was $11,000.00. On January 4, 1985, she filed for relief under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

The parties agree that the Defendant in this case is D.E.F., Inc., a Louisiana corporation, and parent corporation of ABC T.V. and Stereo Rental, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, registered to do business as Color Tyme T.Y. Rental. The Defendant has three locations in the metropolitan area. The store which repossessed Ms. Mercer’s property is located at 560 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota. Color Tyme’s business includes renting electronic equipment with the option to purchase at the end of the lease period.

Ms. Mercer entered into a rental agreement with Color Tyme for a stereo unit on May 10, 1984. The serial number of the stereo is 644020380. The Debtor was current on all prepetition obligations to Color Tyme at the time of filing the Chapter 13 petition. On Tuesday, January 8,1985, Ms. Mercer spoke on the phone with an employee of Color Tyme identified as Andy. Ms. Mercer informed the employee that she had filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy and her attorney would contact Color Tyme on her behalf. Color Tyme received formal notice of the bankruptcy by mail on Tuesday, January 15, 1985. In the phone conversation on January 8, Color Tyme employee, Andy, demanded either payment of the next installment or return of the equipment.

On Thursday, January 10, 1985, Color Tyme employee, Andy, called the Mercer residence and was informed that Ms. Mercer was not at home. He left a message at the Mercer home that Color Tyme was demanding payment or return of the equipment immediately. Ms. Mercer did not act on the request.

*564 On the morning of January 11, 1985, Ms. Mercer’s three-year-old child Niki was stricken with an extremely high fever. She took the child to get emergency medical treatment at a nearby hospital. Ms. Mercer remained at the hospital with her child for the remainder of the day. At approximately 4:00 p.m. two employees from Color Tyme T.V. went to the Mercer residence with the specific intent to repossess the stereo unit. At the home was a 26-year-old woman identified as Aunt Felicia, along with four minor children. The two employees were informed that Ms. Mercer was not at home and that they could not, under any circumstance, enter the home.

The two employees left the home without incident. Ms. Mercer phoned home from the hospital at approximately 4:30 p.m. She was told that Color Tyme T.V. had come to the home and demanded return of the stereo. She then phoned her attorney, Samuel Werthiemer, and explained the situation. Mr. Werthiemer phoned Mr. Robert Bryan, the manager of the Color Tyme store. Mr. Werthiemer informed Mr. Bryan that Ms. Mercer had filed for relief in the Bankruptcy Court and Color Tyme was prohibited from repossessing the collateral. Mr. Bryan informed Mr. Wer-thiemer that Color Tyme had legal counsel and understood its repossession rights. At that point, Mr. Bryan directed Color Tyme employees to return to the Mercer home and repossess the stereo.

Two Color Tyme employees returned to the home at approximately 6:30 p.m. At home, at this time, were Robert and Niki Mercer, along with Angie and Joey Koeh-ler, cousins of the Mercer family. All were minor children under 15 years of age. Aunt Felicia had left the home leaving strict instructions not to allow anyone into the home. The two employees pounded and kicked a metal rear entrance door for five to ten minutes. They could see the children through an adjacent window and demanded entrance. The kicking and pounding caused substantial damage to the door, ruining it. The incident was extremely frightening to all of the children in the home and after approximately ten minutes, the children opened the door. The two employees entered the home uninvited and asked the whereabouts of the stereo unit. The children told the two employees that it was upstairs and they immediately walked up the stairs and summarily repossessed the stereo.

The replacement cost for the prehung metal door is $510.10. Ms. Mercer incurred reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in bringing this contempt proceeding in the amount of $1,907.99.

II.

Upon the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, an automatic stay is imposed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). This stay prohibits creditors from taking any action against the debtor or property of the debtor’s estate. The stay constitutes an order of the Court and, in this case, was automatically imposed on January 4,1985, when Ms. Mercer filed her bankruptcy petition.

Furthermore, even a mere posses-sory interest in property is protected by the automatic stay. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 309 U.S. 478, 60 S.Ct. 628, 84 L.Ed.2d 876 (1940); In Matter of GSVC Restaurant Corp., 3 B.R. 491 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1980); Matter of DePoy, 29 B.R. 471 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1983). Accordingly, Color Tyme’s action against the Debtor’s home and her property violated the stay.

Color Tyme claims that it had not received official, formal notice of the bankruptcy until after the incident occurred and that it should not be held to have had knowledge of the bankruptcy petition for purposes of contempt when it repossessed the equipment. However, if a creditor has actual knowledge of the bankruptcy, the stay precludes any further action against the debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc. (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors), 550 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir.1976) ce rt. denied 429 U.S. 1093, 97 S.Ct. 1107, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Matter of DePoy, 29 B.R. 471 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1983). The DePoy case stated:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evex Ross Franklin
M.D. North Carolina, 2020
In re Johnson
601 B.R. 365 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2019)
Jonathan Hunsaker v. United States
902 F.3d 963 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
In re Stewart
499 B.R. 557 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
Miller v. United States
422 B.R. 168 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2010)
Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Taylor (Taylor)
369 B.R. 282 (S.D. West Virginia, 2007)
Keen v. Premium Asset Recovery Corp. (In Re Keen)
301 B.R. 749 (S.D. Florida, 2003)
In Re Welch
296 B.R. 170 (C.D. Illinois, 2003)
Johnson v. Credit Acceptance Corp.
165 F. Supp. 2d 923 (D. Minnesota, 2001)
Barker v. Altegra Credit Co. (In Re Barker)
251 B.R. 250 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2000)
In Re Klein
226 B.R. 542 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
In Re Novak
223 B.R. 363 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
Solfanelli v. Meridian Bank (In Re Solfanelli)
206 B.R. 699 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
In Re Sumpter
171 B.R. 835 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
Flynn v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Flynn)
169 B.R. 1007 (S.D. Georgia, 1994)
Matter of Washington
172 B.R. 415 (S.D. Georgia, 1994)
In re Tardo
145 B.R. 862 (E.D. Louisiana, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 B.R. 562, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-def-inc-mnb-1985.