Mercer v. Callaway

United States Court of Military Appeals

Mercer v. Callaway

22 C.M.A. 667

United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided November 6, 1973·No. No. 73-59·Published

Opinion

On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of Habeas Corpus” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the relief requested is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction, it is, by the Court, this 6th day of November 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Judge Duncan would issue an order directing the respondents to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of Habeas Corpus” filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the relief requested is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction, it is, by the Court, this 6th day of November 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Judge Duncan would issue an order directing the respondents to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted.

Mercer v. Callaway, 22 C.M.A. 667 (cma 1973).

Pincite

22 C.M.A. 667 (Mercer v. Callaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.