Mercer v. Ballard

534 F. App'x 199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6738
StatusPublished

This text of 534 F. App'x 199 (Mercer v. Ballard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercer v. Ballard, 534 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward J. Mercer seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting in part and declining to adopt in part the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and dismissing as untimely all but one of Mercer’s claims in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Mercer seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-ballard-ca4-2013.