Mercer Milling Co. v. State
This text of 274 A.D. 843 (Mercer Milling Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss a claim for alleged interference with, and appropriation of, part of the water power rights of claimants at Baldwinsville as the result of Barge Canal construction and operation.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See post, p. 869.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-milling-co-v-state-nyappdiv-1948.