Mercer D. Eubanks Mercer B. Eubanks Edna B. Eubanks Homer Eubanks v. South Carolina National Bank Luthi Mortgage Company, Inc. Perry S. Luthi

849 F.2d 604, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7999, 1988 WL 60905
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1988
Docket88-3016
StatusUnpublished

This text of 849 F.2d 604 (Mercer D. Eubanks Mercer B. Eubanks Edna B. Eubanks Homer Eubanks v. South Carolina National Bank Luthi Mortgage Company, Inc. Perry S. Luthi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercer D. Eubanks Mercer B. Eubanks Edna B. Eubanks Homer Eubanks v. South Carolina National Bank Luthi Mortgage Company, Inc. Perry S. Luthi, 849 F.2d 604, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7999, 1988 WL 60905 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

849 F.2d 604
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mercer D. EUBANKS; Mercer B. Eubanks; Edna B. Eubanks;
Homer Eubanks, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; Luthi Mortgage Company, Inc.;
Perry S. Luthi, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3016.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 1988.
Decided: June 14, 1988.

Mercer D. Eubanks, Mercer B. Eubanks, Edna B. Eubanks, Homer Eubanks, appellants pro se.

Before WIDENER and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Mercer D. Eubanks, Mercer B. Eubanks, Edna B. Eubanks, and Homer Eubanks appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Eubanks v. South Carolina National Bank, C/A No. 87-2970 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abrams (Donald H.) v. Feinblatt (Eugene M.)
849 F.2d 604 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 F.2d 604, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7999, 1988 WL 60905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-d-eubanks-mercer-b-eubanks-edna-b-eubanks-h-ca4-1988.