Mercer County Commission v. Division of Corrections

21 Ct. Cl. 185
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedApril 11, 1997
DocketCC-97-96
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 185 (Mercer County Commission v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercer County Commission v. Division of Corrections, 21 Ct. Cl. 185 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent’s Answer.

Claimant seeks payment of $493.68 for travel expenses incurred to return certain fugitives from justice to West Virginia from other states. The travel expense vouchers were not forwarded to the respondent State agency in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been reimbursed for these expenses. These expenses are paid from the Governor’s Civil Contingent Fund which is administered through the respondent. Respondent, in its Answer, admits the validity of the claim, but states that there were insufficient funds in the appropriate account for the fiscal year in question from which to pay these travel expenses.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Services, et al. vs. Dept. of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ct. Cl. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-county-commission-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1997.