Mercelis v. Grahame

5 P.R. Fed. 492
District Court, D. Puerto Rico·Decided April 25, 1910·No. No. 602·Published

Opinion

Kodey, Judge,

delivered the following opinion:

This is another of what have come to be known as the Caño de Tiburones cases. It is said that several similar cases have been, or are, pending in the insular courts. The first of them with which we had to do in this court was that of Rubert y Catala v. Grahame, 4 Porto Rico Fed. Rep. 538, where a statement of the supposed facts surrounding the situation can be found. To repeat them in about the same form, they are about as follows:

Prom time immemorial there has existed along the north shore of the island of Porto Rico, parallel to the Atlantic ocean, and only separated from it by a spit of land from a few hundred years to about a mile wide, a slough or swamp known in early days as “El Caño de Tiburones,” and later as “El Caño or Laguna de Tiburones.” The slough or swamp is about 12 miles long, reaching from near Bareeloneta, on the east, to Arecibo, on the west. It was pretty well established by the evidence that there is within it a channel or channels of open water for a short distance on the east end, and for a slightly longer distance on the west end; but the evidence was in great conflict as to whether any such open water existed through the remaining 7 or 8 miles of the middle portion or body of it. In width this caño or swamp varies from several hundred yards to a mile and a half or more. It is almost entirely covered by what the [494] natives call “cortadera,” which is a sort of swamp grass or flag, 6 or 8 feet high, the sides or edges of which-plant, spear, or grass have minute cutting teeth (hence the name “cortadera”), as well as on the back or spine. There are other sorts of swamp vegetation there also that will be referred to- hereafter. The south shore of this caño or swamp is the only one with which wo are concerned in this suit, and the evidence shows that its limits are quite indefinite in some places and well defined in others; and that its boundary meanders much, and that at places, points of the swamp vegetation extend some little distance from the main body south into the high and dry ground. It was also in evidence that there are small, partially bare patches here and there in the swamp, and some small patches covered with shrubbery and bushes not of the swamp variety, the ground being slightly higher in such small spots, but it appears that these places occur almost entirely near the shores of the main swamp, and close to the actual dry land.

It was fully established in evidence that for several years past, and probably from time immemorial, this Caño de Tibur-ones and more or less of the swamp lands surrounding it have been considered as public land, which it is said was owned by the government in Spanish times, and which of course passed to the United States under the treaty of Paris, and was afterwards, under § 13 of the Foraker law (31 Stat. at L. 80, chap. 191), turned over to the island, to be administered by the local government for the benefit of the people of Porto Eico. The local legislature was given full power to legislate with regard to all such public property.

In December, 1907, the local legislature leased or gave a concession or franchise for all of the land embraced in this Caño [495] or Laguna de Tiburones, and probably other lands in that vicinity, to the respondent Wenceslao Borda, Jr., and his assigns. The concession was first given, as it is said, for a period of some fifteen years; but a year later, on the 19th of February, 1908, this concession, lease, or franchise, whatever it is, was extended for an additional twenty-five years, or a forty-year period in all. During this period of time the concessionee was given the right, and is probably obliged under certain restrictions and conditions in the contract contained, to occupy and drain the land, and is privileged to put it to such profitable agricultural uses as may be deemed expedient; such as the planting of sugar cane and other crops. It was contemplated, of course, that this would involve large expenditures in the way of draining, dredging, and clearing the swamp, and in cultivating the whole or such portions as could be reclaimed. It developed that as soon as the matter of granting a concession to anybody for reclaiming these lands began to be agitated, the adjoining owners began-to see to it that their boundary lines were properly marked and protected, and the immediate result, as it is said, was that quite a few conflicts regarding the same arose. The government records showed that this caño should contain between 6,500 and 1,000 acres, but only 4,200 acres were found to deliver to respondent Borda. This suit was originally brought against Laurence H. Grahame and others, the former being the then commissioner of interior of the island, and under whose supervision the demarking of the caño ór swamp and the putting of Borda in possession were carried on. At the trial the name of John A. Wilson, the new commissioner of the interior, was substituted for that of Mr. Grahame.

We are concerned with but two pieces of abutting property [496] in this suit. A large blue print or plat that was made under the supervision of the commissioner of the interior of the island, that demarks the supposed boundaries of the Caño or La-guna, and sets forth the supposed boundaries of the adjoining owners of land, was introduced as exhibit Q by complainants. The easterly piece of land of the two in dispute here is No. 72 on this plat, and the westerly one is No. 74. The first is owned by complainants Mercelis and Greene, and the second by complainant Juan Ramon Lorenzo Domenech, the latter having purchased it from the other complainant, Greene. It is not certain how much of the northern portion of parcel No. 72 complainants contend that respondents are trying to take away from them, but as to the westerly one, No. 74, it was fully in evidence that respondents were trying to dispossess Domenech from practically his entire tract of 146 cuerdas.

A trial of the issues was had in open session by the court itself without the intervention of an examiner or master, which occupied five or six days, beginning February 28, 1910. "While the suit is against John A. Wilson as an individual, naturally, the island being interested in delivering the land it claims to own, to the respondent Borda, under its concession to him, the attorney general’s office represented him in the suit, and within the month following the trial fifty-page carefully prepared briefs and arguments were filed by both sides, setting forth their respective legal contentions. Whilst it involved considerable labor to examine the record and these briefs, still it was interesting, owing to the range counsel took in their views of the situation. However, we have come to see the law of the case in a much simpler light than at first.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercelis v. Grahame, 5 P.R. Fed. 492 (prd 1910).

5 P.R. Fed. 492 (Mercelis v. Grahame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.