Mercedes Dickerson v. Arthur Hodge
This text of 407 F.2d 848 (Mercedes Dickerson v. Arthur Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in a suit brought to settle the location of the boundary line between Lots 9 and 8A Adel Gade in King’s Quarter of the town of Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, owned, respectively, by the plaintiff and the defendant. The district court reviewed the facts and concluded that the true boundary between the lots was that contended for by the plaintiff and shown on a survey plan dated November 3, 1956, prepared by Sidney Baptiste, surveyor. We find ourselves in complete accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as stated in its opinion to which we need add nothing.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F.2d 848, 7 V.I. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercedes-dickerson-v-arthur-hodge-ca3-1969.