Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Popham

65 So. 3d 47, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7172, 2011 WL 1877852
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2011
DocketNo. 4D09-3300
StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 3d 47 (Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Popham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Popham, 65 So. 3d 47, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7172, 2011 WL 1877852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TOWBIN SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge.

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to David Popham (“Pop-ham”), pursuant to section 681.112, Florida Statutes (2010). The underlying facts are as follows: Popham had purchased a new Mercedes-Benz from MBUSA. The car was subsequently declared a “lemon” by the Florida Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board. Neither party appealed the board’s decision and Popham received a refund. Popham’s lawyer (who had represented Popham during the arbitration proceedings) then filed a lawsuit in circuit court seeking recovery of the attorney’s fees pursuant to section 681.112, Florida Statutes. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Popham, ordering MBUSA to pay Popham’s arbitration hearing attorney’s fees.

The issue in this case is whether Florida’s “Lemon Law” authorizes an award of attorney’s fees incurred during arbitration of the refund option. This exact issue was recently addressed and decided in General Motors, LLC v. Bowie, 58 So.3d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The answer is no, “ ‘damages’ under section 681.112 do not include attorney’s fees incurred in pursuing the refund option through arbitration.” Bowie at 936.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand the final judgment in its entirety and direct the trial court to undertake further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Motors LLC v. Bowie
58 So. 3d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 3d 47, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7172, 2011 WL 1877852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercedes-benz-usa-llc-v-popham-fladistctapp-2011.