Home/New York Court of Appeals/Merced v. Fisher

Merced v. Fisher

343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 942, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2343
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 19, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 343 N.E.2d 288 (Merced v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merced v. Fisher, 343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 942, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2343 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Motion for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person dismissed as academic.

On the court’s own motion, appeal transferred to the Appellate Division, Second Department, without costs. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved. (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2; Matter of Bartsch v State of New York, 33 NY2d 938.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartsch v. State
309 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 N.E.2d 288, 37 N.Y.2d 942, 380 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merced-v-fisher-ny-1975.