Home/New York Court of Appeals/Merced v. City of New York

Merced v. City of New York

551 N.E.2d 589, 75 N.Y.2d 798, 552 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 82
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 551 N.E.2d 589 (Merced v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merced v. City of New York, 551 N.E.2d 589, 75 N.Y.2d 798, 552 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 82 (N.Y. 1990).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict granted and judgment entered in defendant’s favor dismissing the complaint.

A municipality may not be held liable for injuries resulting from the failure to provide police protection to an individual absent a "special relationship” between the municipality and the individual (Kircher v City of Jamestown, 74 NY2d 251, [800]*800255; Cuffy v City of New York, 69 NY2d 255, 260). Such a relationship cannot be established without proof that the injured party had direct contact with the municipality’s agents and justifiably relied to his or her detriment on the municipality’s assurances that it would act on that party’s behalf (Kircher v City of Jamestown, supra, at 259; Cuffy v City of New York, supra, at 260).

Here, there was no evidence that the decedent contacted the municipality’s agents or relied on any assurances of assistance, and the involvement of third parties did not satisfy these requirements. On this record, we cannot conclude that the municipality’s conduct deprived decedent of assistance that reasonably could have been expected from another source (cf., Sorichetti v City of New York, 65 NY2d 461; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur; Judge Bellacosa concurs on constraint of Kircher v City of Jamestown (74 NY2d 251), noting that this "911” domestic violence case represents another troublesome application of the special duty municipal liability immunity rule and that the court itself recognized in Kircher (id., at 259) that change would have to come from the Legislature.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict granted, and judgment granted in defendant’s favor dismissing the complaint, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. City of New York
119 A.D.3d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Martinez v. County of Suffolk
999 F. Supp. 2d 424 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc.
995 N.E.2d 131 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
WOOD, II, ROBERT W. v. NIGRO, JR., RICHARD J.
81 A.D.3d 1453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Laratro v. City of New York
25 A.D.3d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Armstrong v. Scott
21 A.D.3d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dixon v. Village of Spring Valley
6 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Pelaez v. Seide
810 N.E.2d 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
D'Ambra v. Di Donna
305 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Apostolakis v. Centereach Fire District
300 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Gillette v. City of Elmira
285 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Fried v. Archer
775 A.2d 430 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Lauer v. City of New York
733 N.E.2d 184 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Burger v. County of Onondaga
272 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Luisa R. v. City of New York
253 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Jessop v. City of Niagara Falls
247 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Mastroianni v. County of Suffolk
691 N.E.2d 613 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Brown v. State of New York
674 N.E.2d 1129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Hancock v. City of New York
230 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lorber v. Hamburg
225 A.D.2d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 N.E.2d 589, 75 N.Y.2d 798, 552 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merced-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1990.