Merced Co. v. Hicks

7 P. 181, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483
California Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1885·No. No. 9599·Published

Opinion

By the COURT.

If, as we held in Merced Co. v. Hicks, 67 Cal. 108, 7 Pac. 179, the order vacating the judgment against the respondents was properly made on the ground that they had not been served with summons or appeared in the action, it necessarily follows that the refusal to make an order that said respondents should answer the complaint was not error.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merced Co. v. Hicks, 7 P. 181, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483 (Cal. 1885).

7 P. 181 (Merced Co. v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merced County v. Hicks
7 P. 179 (California Supreme Court, 1885)