Merced Co. v. Hicks
7 P. 181, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483
This text of 7 P. 181 (Merced Co. v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Merced Co. v. Hicks, 7 P. 181, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483 (Cal. 1885).
Opinion
If, as we held in Merced Co. v. Hicks, 67 Cal. 108, 7 Pac. 179, the order vacating the judgment against the respondents was properly made on the ground that they had not been served with summons or appeared in the action, it necessarily follows that the refusal to make an order that said respondents should answer the complaint was not error.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Merced County v. Hicks
7 P. 179 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 P. 181, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merced-co-v-hicks-cal-1885.