Mercardo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mercardo v. State

386 S.W.3d 212, 2012 WL 5866618

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2012·No. No. ED 98066·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Mercardo appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing from his guilty plea to seven counts of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Mercardo appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing from his guilty plea to seven counts of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Mercardo v. State, 386 S.W.3d 212, 2012 WL 5866618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 212 (Mercardo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related