Mercantile Safe-Deposit Co. v. Dimon

25 N.Y.S. 388, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 209, 72 Hun 638
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 25 N.Y.S. 388 (Mercantile Safe-Deposit Co. v. Dimon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercantile Safe-Deposit Co. v. Dimon, 25 N.Y.S. 388, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 209, 72 Hun 638 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It satisfactorily appears to us that the Mercantile Safe-Deposit Company cannot, with safety to itself, deliver the property the subject-matter of this action to either of the claimants. Therefore it has a right to maintain this action of interpleader, and be protected from other claims and litigations in respect to this properly. The order appealed from should be reversed, and the motion for continuing the injunction granted, with $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, and $10 costs of the motion in the court below, to abide the final event of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 N.Y.S. 388, 79 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 209, 72 Hun 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercantile-safe-deposit-co-v-dimon-nysupct-1893.