Mercantile Ins. Co. v. The Orphan Boy

17 F. Cas. 25, 3 Cin. L. Bull. 593
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedApril 15, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F. Cas. 25 (Mercantile Ins. Co. v. The Orphan Boy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercantile Ins. Co. v. The Orphan Boy, 17 F. Cas. 25, 3 Cin. L. Bull. 593 (N.D. Ohio 1878).

Opinion

WELICER, District Judge.

The wife of David Becker was the owner of three-fourths of the Orphan Boy. He husband was the master, and acted as her general agent in the management of her part of the vessel. On the 2nd day of April, A. D. 1877, said David Becker, in his own name, took out a policy of insurance in the libelant’s company for the sum of $2,000, on which he was to pay a premium of $140. That at the time of the insurance nothing was said of the ownership of the wife to any part of the vessel, or that the insurance was for her benefit; but the company supposed him to be the owner; nor was there any proof that the wife expressly authorized or directed the insurance to be made. The premium was not paid, and this libel is filed to assert a lien on the vessel for such unpaid premium.

Held: 1. That the husband, as master of the vessel, had no authority to make the insurance in his own name. 2. That the husband of the wife had no insurable interest in the wife’s interest of the vessel, so as to create a lien upon the vessel for the premium. 3. That the insurance and policy being in the name of David Becker alone, and “not for the interest of all concerned," the company was only liable, if liable at all, to him, and not to the owners of the vessel in case of loss; and he having no insurable interest in the vessel, the policy could not be enforced against the libelants in case of a loss. That, where the policy itself was such as could not be enforced by the owner of the vessel, the insurance thereof created no lien on the same for the premium agreed to be paid. The libel is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 25, 3 Cin. L. Bull. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercantile-ins-co-v-the-orphan-boy-ohnd-1878.