Mercantile Bank, N.A. v. Walton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mercantile Bank, N.A. v. Walton

807 S.W.2d 203, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 532, 1991 WL 56016

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1991·No. No. 58311·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Elbert A. Walton, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mercantile Bank, N.A., f/k/a Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., on an action for the balance due on a promissory note. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff-bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 74.04(c). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Elbert A. Walton, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mercantile Bank, N.A., f/k/a Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., on an action for the balance due on a promissory note. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff-bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 74.04(c). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Mercantile Bank, N.A. v. Walton, 807 S.W.2d 203, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 532, 1991 WL 56016 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

807 S.W.2d 203 (Mercantile Bank, N.A. v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.