Mercado v. State

13 So. 3d 1112, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9980, 2009 WL 2168816
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 2009·No. 3D09-1773·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

Domingo Mercado (“Mercado”) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct illegal sentences imposed in the eight cases listed above. The gravamen of Mercado’s complaint is the Prison Releas-ee Reoffender adjudications and resulting mandatory sentences imposed on each count of burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. Although Mercado correctly notes that the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001), held that the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute did not apply to burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, his reliance on Huggins is misplaced as the Legislature amended the statute, effective July 1, 2001, to include burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a qualifying offense under the statute. As Mercado’s crimes were all committed after July 1, 2001, the trial court correctly denied Mercado’s motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercado v. State, 13 So. 3d 1112, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9980, 2009 WL 2168816 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

13 So. 3d 1112 (Mercado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCleese v. State
94 So. 3d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Morgan v. State
47 So. 3d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)