Mercado v. State

782 So. 2d 546, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5177, 2001 WL 387671
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Collier v. State, 701 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (contents of BOLO report were admissible where report contained no accusatory information and was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to establish sequence of events); Williams v. State, 714 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercado v. State, 782 So. 2d 546, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5177, 2001 WL 387671 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

782 So. 2d 546 (Mercado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
714 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Collier v. State
701 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)