Mercado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mercado v. State

782 So. 2d 546, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5177, 2001 WL 387671

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1093

StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 546 (Mercado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mercado v. State, 782 So. 2d 546, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5177, 2001 WL 387671 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Collier v. State, 701 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (contents of BOLO report were admissible where report contained no accusatory information and was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to establish sequence of events); Williams v. State, 714 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Collier v. State, 701 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (contents of BOLO report were admissible where report contained no accusatory information and was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to establish sequence of events); Williams v. State, 714 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 So. 2d 546, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5177, 2001 WL 387671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercado-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack