Mercado v. State
427 So. 2d 338, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20258
Opinion
Affirmed. See Mullins v. State, 366 So.2d 1162 (Fla.1978) (Alderman, J., concurring), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 S.Ct. 173, 62 L.Ed.2d 113 (1979); Wright v. State, 418 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Neely v. State, 402 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Ramos, 378 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
We have examined the issue presented by the cross-appeal and find the cross-appeal to be without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mercado v. State, 427 So. 2d 338, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
427 So. 2d 338 (Mercado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mullins v. State
366 So. 2d 1162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Wright v. State
418 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Neely v. State
402 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Login v. State
394 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Ramos
378 So. 2d 1294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)