Mercado v. Smith

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Mercado v. Smith

7 P.R. 89

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedMay 25, 1904

DocketNo. 71

StatusPublished

This text of 7 P.R. 89 (Mercado v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mercado v. Smith, 7 P.R. 89 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNbs,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from, with the exception of the second conclusion of law.

In view of article 395 of the Mortgage Law, and the articles of the Law of Civil Procedure and General Order No. 118 of 1899, applicable to the case, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with the costs against the appellant.

Justices Hernández, Figueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr..Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Chief Justice QuiñoNbs,

after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

We accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from, with the exception of the second conclusion of law.

In view of article 395 of the Mortgage Law, and the articles of the Law of Civil Procedure and General Order No. 118 of 1899, applicable to the case, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with the costs against the appellant.

Justices Hernández, Figueras and MacLeary concurred. Mr..Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.R. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercado-v-smith-prsupreme-1904.