Mercado v. Fitell
875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417
Opinion
We reverse the trial court=s order denying the appellant’s right to pursue a negligence claim against a court appointed receiver. Because the appellant filed this negligence complaint within the four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s ruling to the contrary constitutes obvious error and requires reversal. See Hardy Equip. Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc., 530 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So.2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mercado v. Fitell, 875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
875 So. 2d 807 (Mercado v. Fitell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardy Equipment Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc.
530 So. 2d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Pezzi v. Brown
697 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)