Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mercado v. Fitell

Mercado v. Fitell

875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-2036
StatusPublished

This text of 875 So. 2d 807 (Mercado v. Fitell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercado v. Fitell, 875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court=s order denying the appellant’s right to pursue a negligence claim against a court appointed receiver. Because the appellant filed this negligence complaint within the four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s ruling to the contrary constitutes obvious error and requires reversal. See Hardy Equip. Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc., 530 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So.2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardy Equipment Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc.
530 So. 2d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Pezzi v. Brown
697 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercado-v-fitell-fladistctapp-2004.