Mercado v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2010 Ohio 203
Ohio Court of Claims·Decided January 11, 2010·No. 2007-06381·Published

Opinion

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

ARIEL MERCADO

Plaintiff

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant

Case No. 2007-06381

Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Steven A. Larson

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} On October 27, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.

{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

Case No. 2007-06381 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge

cc:

Daniel R. Forsythe Lester S. Potash Assistant Attorney General 1717 Illuminating Building 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor 55 Public Square Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1901

MR/cmd Filed January 11, 2010 To S.C. reporter January 25, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercado v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010 Ohio 203 (Ohio Super. Ct. 2010).

2010 Ohio 203 (Mercado v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.