Mercado v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Opinion
Court of Claims of Ohio
The Ohio Judicial Center
65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215
614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
ARIEL MERCADO
Plaintiff
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION
Defendant
Case No. 2007-06381
Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Steven A. Larson
JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} On October 27, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.
{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.
{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
Case No. 2007-06381 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY
JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge
cc:
Daniel R. Forsythe Lester S. Potash Assistant Attorney General 1717 Illuminating Building 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor 55 Public Square Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1901
MR/cmd Filed January 11, 2010 To S.C. reporter January 25, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 Ohio 203 (Mercado v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.