Meranelli v. State of Minnesota
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli, also Civ. No. 22-946 (JWB/DTS) known as Eric Sorenson,
Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
State of Minnesota et al.,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on February 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 142.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The February 9, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 142) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. No. 129) is DENIED.
Date: February 26, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meranelli v. State of Minnesota (Meranelli v. State of Minnesota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.