Meranelli v. Pruette
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli, Civ. No. 23-2260 (JWB/DJF)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING Jesse Ryan Pruette, Security Counselor REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION assigned to the Special Services OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Department & Plaintiff’s Primary Property Person-MSOP – sued in his official and individual capacity, Jane Does, John Does,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on August 21, 2024. (Doc. No. 128.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The August 21, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 128) is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s motion to exclude Plaintiff’s deposition transcript, Amanda Hyke’s Declaration, and Amanda Hyke’s testimony (Doc. No. 107) is DENIED; and 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Date: September 13, 2024 _s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meranelli v. Pruette (Meranelli v. Pruette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.