Merakian v. State

550 So. 2d 551, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2517, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6014, 1989 WL 126645
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1989
DocketNo. 89-00164
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 550 So. 2d 551 (Merakian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merakian v. State, 550 So. 2d 551, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2517, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6014, 1989 WL 126645 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a guidelines sentence he received for an offense committed prior to the effective date of the guidelines. We affirm the sentence, because appellant did not affirmatively elect to be sentenced under the guidelines and the sentence imposed was less than the applicable statutory maximum. We remand, however, for amendment of the sentencing order to reflect that appellant was not sentenced under the guidelines and retains his parole rights. See Norton v. State, 521 So.2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MGT. v. City of St. Cloud
550 So. 2d 551 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 So. 2d 551, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2517, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6014, 1989 WL 126645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merakian-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.