Meola v. Crim Et Ux

109 So. 100, 91 Fla. 1033
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 3, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon .the, transcript of -the. record of the. *1034 decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the x-espective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said deeiee; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Cilcuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meola v. Crim Et Ux, 109 So. 100, 91 Fla. 1033 (Fla. 1926).

109 So. 100 (Meola v. Crim Et Ux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.