Menzies v. Harlem Loan Ass'n
This text of 30 Misc. 781 (Menzies v. Harlem Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record discloses no objection on the part of the appellant to the costs as allowed, and it is too late to raise that question, for the first time, on appeal.
There being no competent evidence, however, in the case to support the finding of damages for the wrongful detention of the chattel, the judgment will be reduced from eighty-three dollars and twenty-two cents to thirty-one dollars and twenty-two cents, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
Beekman, P. J., and Giegerich, J., concur.
Judgment .modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Misc. 781, 62 N.Y.S. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menzies-v-harlem-loan-assn-nyappterm-1900.