Mentor Corp. v. Cox-Uphoff Corp.

923 F.2d 868, 1990 WL 186824
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 1990
Docket90-1181
StatusUnpublished

This text of 923 F.2d 868 (Mentor Corp. v. Cox-Uphoff Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mentor Corp. v. Cox-Uphoff Corp., 923 F.2d 868, 1990 WL 186824 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

923 F.2d 868

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
MENTOR CORPORATION and Linda Radovan Williamson, as
executrix of the Estate of Chedomir Radovan,
Hilton Becker, M.D. and Beverley Anne
Becker, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
COX-UPHOFF CORPORATION and Cox-Uphoff International,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 90-1181.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1990.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the stipulated motion for voluntary dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted and the case is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Oao Corp
923 F.2d 868 (Federal Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 F.2d 868, 1990 WL 186824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mentor-corp-v-cox-uphoff-corp-cafc-1990.