Mento v. State
802 So. 2d 400, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, 2001 WL 1472629
Opinion
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Biago Mentó challenges his convictions entered upon his plea to uttering a forged check and grand theft. We affirm without prejudice to him [401]*401filing any appropriate posLconviction motions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mento v. State, 802 So. 2d 400, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, 2001 WL 1472629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
802 So. 2d 400 (Mento v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)