Mento v. State

802 So. 2d 400, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, 2001 WL 1472629
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-4212
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 400 (Mento v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mento v. State, 802 So. 2d 400, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, 2001 WL 1472629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Biago Mentó challenges his convictions entered upon his plea to uttering a forged check and grand theft. We affirm without prejudice to him [401]*401filing any appropriate posLconviction motions.

POLEN, C.J., GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 400, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, 2001 WL 1472629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mento-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.